Astudy on secondhand smoke from the next generation of heat-not-burn cigarettes found the products release some of the same cancer-causing chemicals as do traditional cigarettes.To get more news about Hitaste p6, you can visit hitaste.net official website.
The study by the University of Bern in Switzerland was published Friday in JAMA Internal Medicine.Heat-not-burn cigarettes are considered as a potential reduced-risk product because the burning of tobacco leaves releases carcinogens.
The technology is in use by Philip Morris International with the Marlboro HeatStick, which is sold primarily in Italy, Japan and Switzerland. It is available in 25 countries. The HeatStick has 10 percent of the overall Japanese cigarette market, the company said.
On May 24, the Food and Drug Administration accepted a modified-risk tobacco production application from Philip Morris for a review process that is projected to last at least a year. Philip Morris Products SA submitted applications for the iQOS systems with Marlboro HeatSticks, Marlboro Smooth Menthol HeatSticks and Marlboro Fresh Menthol HeatSticks.The authors of the Bern study said they tried to determine whether heat-not-burn cigarettes were a viable, healthier alternative to combustible cigarettes since most previous knowledge was industry driven.
The researchers determined that “although these products may or may not produce smoke, they release cancer-causing chemicals … similar levels of many volatile organic compounds and nicotine as conventional cigarettes and higher levels of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon acenaphthene than conventional cigarettes.”
“There can be smoke without fire,” Dr. Reto Auer said. “There is no safe minimum limit for some of the chemicals.“Dancing around the definition of smoke to avoid indoor-smoking bans is unethical. Independent studies should further evaluate the health effects of the IQOS.“In the meantime, heated tobacco products, such as IQOS, should fall under the same indoor-smoking bans as for conventional tobacco cigarettes,” Auer said.
Dr. Mitchell Katz, who wrote an editor’s note on the study for the publication, said there is some scientific concern that “these products threaten the progress that has been made on decreasing the harms of second-hand smoke because existing bans may not apply to these heat-not-burn products.”